mirror of
https://gitlab.com/fabinfra/fabaccess/fabaccess-api.git
synced 2025-03-12 14:51:42 +01:00
temporary fix to build cs
This commit is contained in:
parent
f7cb8a7d81
commit
158d307d74
@ -5,5 +5,5 @@ When returning an Interface it may be required to append a dummy valueto work ar
|
||||
|
||||
```diff
|
||||
- whoami @4 () -> ( you :Api.User );
|
||||
+ whoami @4 () -> ( you :Api.User, dummy :UInt8 = 0 );
|
||||
+ whoami @4 () -> ( you :Api.User, dummy :UInt8 = 0 );
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
|
||||
@0xf6520578f143b471;
|
||||
|
||||
using CSharp = import "programming_language/csharp.capnp";
|
||||
$CSharp.namespace("FabAccessAPI.Schema");
|
||||
|
||||
using import "utils.capnp".UUID;
|
||||
|
||||
struct Cache(Value) {
|
||||
|
11
claim.capnp
11
claim.capnp
@ -3,9 +3,10 @@
|
||||
using CSharp = import "programming_language/csharp.capnp";
|
||||
$CSharp.namespace("FabAccessAPI.Schema");
|
||||
|
||||
using import "/capnp/rpc.capnp".SturdyRef;
|
||||
# TODO: removed SturdyRef to build API in C#
|
||||
# using import "/capnp/rpc.capnp".SturdyRef;
|
||||
# using import "persistent.capnp".Persistent;
|
||||
|
||||
using import "persistent.capnp".Persistent;
|
||||
using import "resource.capnp".Resource;
|
||||
using import "notify.capnp".Notifiable;
|
||||
using import "utils.capnp".Fallible;
|
||||
@ -23,7 +24,9 @@ interface Claimable {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
interface Lockable {
|
||||
restore @0 ( sturdy :SturdyRef ) -> ( lock :Lock );
|
||||
restore @0 ( ) -> ( lock :Lock );
|
||||
# TODO: removed SturdyRef to build API in C#
|
||||
# restore @0 ( sturdy :SturdyRef ) -> ( lock :Lock );
|
||||
# Restore a previously saved SturdyRef pointing to a Lock
|
||||
|
||||
lock @1 () -> ( lock :Lock );
|
||||
@ -40,7 +43,7 @@ interface Lockable {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
interface Claim extends (Notifiable) {
|
||||
resource @0 () -> ( resource :Resource );
|
||||
resource @0 () -> ( resource :Resource, dummy :UInt8 = 0 );
|
||||
# Pointer back to the resource this claim comes from. Primarily useful when restoring persisted
|
||||
# claims or restoring after a connection failure.
|
||||
|
||||
|
15
main.capnp
15
main.capnp
@ -21,27 +21,38 @@ struct Version
|
||||
interface Bootstrap
|
||||
{
|
||||
getAPIVersion @0 () -> Version;
|
||||
# Returns the API version implemented by the server. As a client, you can compare this version with the local currentVersion.
|
||||
|
||||
getServerRelease @1 () -> ( name :Text, release :Text );
|
||||
# Returns the server implementation name and version/build number Designed only for human-facing
|
||||
# debugging output so should be informative over machine-readable.
|
||||
# Example: ("bffhd", "0.3.1-f397e1e [rustc 1.57.0 (f1edd0429 2021-11-29)]")
|
||||
|
||||
mechanisms @2 () -> ( mechs :List(Mechanism) );
|
||||
getServerInfo @2 () -> ( spacename :Text, instanceurl :Text );
|
||||
# Returns information about the server, which can be used to resolve MDNS to DNS and display the server name to the user.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
mechanisms @3 () -> ( mechs :List(Mechanism) );
|
||||
# Get a list of Mechanisms this server allows in this context.
|
||||
|
||||
createSession @3 ( mechanism :Text ) -> ( authentication :Authentication );
|
||||
createSession @4 ( mechanism :Text ) -> ( authentication :Authentication );
|
||||
# Create a new session with the server that you wish to authenticate using `mechanism`. If the
|
||||
# mechanism is a client-first mechanism you can then immediately call Authentication::step with
|
||||
# initial data in a pipelined fashion. If the mechanism is server-first you must call
|
||||
# Authentication::step with a NULL `data` parameter.
|
||||
|
||||
# register @5 () -> ();
|
||||
# Placeholder for a future capability for users to register themselves.
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct Session {
|
||||
# An API session with the server. The below capabilities are set to NULL if the authenticated
|
||||
# user doesn't have permission to access the system in question, or if the server does not
|
||||
# implement it.
|
||||
|
||||
whoami @0 :User;
|
||||
# Returns the currently authenticated user.
|
||||
|
||||
resources @1 :Resources;
|
||||
# Access to the resources configured.
|
||||
|
240
persistent.capnp
240
persistent.capnp
@ -1,122 +1,126 @@
|
||||
# Copyright (c) 2014 Sandstorm Development Group, Inc. and contributors
|
||||
# Licensed under the MIT License:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
|
||||
# of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
|
||||
# in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
|
||||
# to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
|
||||
# copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
|
||||
# furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
|
||||
# all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
|
||||
# IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
|
||||
# FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
|
||||
# AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
|
||||
# LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
|
||||
# OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
|
||||
# THE SOFTWARE.
|
||||
|
||||
#
|
||||
## Copyright (c) 2014 Sandstorm Development Group, Inc. and contributors
|
||||
## Licensed under the MIT License:
|
||||
##
|
||||
## Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
|
||||
## of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
|
||||
## in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
|
||||
## to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
|
||||
## copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
|
||||
## furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
|
||||
##
|
||||
## The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
|
||||
## all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
|
||||
##
|
||||
## THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
|
||||
## IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
|
||||
## FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
|
||||
## AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
|
||||
## LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
|
||||
## OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
|
||||
## THE SOFTWARE.
|
||||
#
|
||||
@0xb8630836983feed7;
|
||||
|
||||
$import "/capnp/c++.capnp".namespace("capnp");
|
||||
|
||||
interface Persistent@0xc8cb212fcd9f5691(SturdyRef, Owner) {
|
||||
# Interface implemented by capabilities that outlive a single connection. A client may save()
|
||||
# the capability, producing a SturdyRef. The SturdyRef can be stored to disk, then later used to
|
||||
# obtain a new reference to the capability on a future connection.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The exact format of SturdyRef depends on the "realm" in which the SturdyRef appears. A "realm"
|
||||
# is an abstract space in which all SturdyRefs have the same format and refer to the same set of
|
||||
# resources. Every vat is in exactly one realm. All capability clients within that vat must
|
||||
# produce SturdyRefs of the format appropriate for the realm.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Similarly, every VatNetwork also resides in a particular realm. Usually, a vat's "realm"
|
||||
# corresponds to the realm of its main VatNetwork. However, a Vat can in fact communicate over
|
||||
# a VatNetwork in a different realm -- in this case, all SturdyRefs need to be transformed when
|
||||
# coming or going through said VatNetwork. The RPC system has hooks for registering
|
||||
# transformation callbacks for this purpose.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Since the format of SturdyRef is realm-dependent, it is not defined here. An application should
|
||||
# choose an appropriate realm for itself as part of its design. Note that under Sandstorm, every
|
||||
# application exists in its own realm and is therefore free to define its own SturdyRef format;
|
||||
# the Sandstorm platform handles translating between realms.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Note that whether a capability is persistent is often orthogonal to its type. In these cases,
|
||||
# the capability's interface should NOT inherit `Persistent`; instead, just perform a cast at
|
||||
# runtime. It's not type-safe, but trying to be type-safe in these cases will likely lead to
|
||||
# tears. In cases where a particular interface only makes sense on persistent capabilities, it
|
||||
# still should not explicitly inherit Persistent because the `SturdyRef` and `Owner` types will
|
||||
# vary between realms (they may even be different at the call site than they are on the
|
||||
# implementation). Instead, mark persistent interfaces with the $persistent annotation (defined
|
||||
# below).
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Sealing
|
||||
# -------
|
||||
#
|
||||
# As an added security measure, SturdyRefs may be "sealed" to a particular owner, such that
|
||||
# if the SturdyRef itself leaks to a third party, that party cannot actually restore it because
|
||||
# they are not the owner. To restore a sealed capability, you must first prove to its host that
|
||||
# you are the rightful owner. The precise mechanism for this authentication is defined by the
|
||||
# realm.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Sealing is a defense-in-depth mechanism meant to mitigate damage in the case of catastrophic
|
||||
# attacks. For example, say an attacker temporarily gains read access to a database full of
|
||||
# SturdyRefs: it would be unfortunate if it were then necessary to revoke every single reference
|
||||
# in the database to prevent the attacker from using them.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# In general, an "owner" is a course-grained identity. Because capability-based security is still
|
||||
# the primary mechanism of security, it is not necessary nor desirable to have a separate "owner"
|
||||
# identity for every single process or object; that is exactly what capabilities are supposed to
|
||||
# avoid! Instead, it makes sense for an "owner" to literally identify the owner of the machines
|
||||
# where the capability is stored. If untrusted third parties are able to run arbitrary code on
|
||||
# said machines, then the sandbox for that code should be designed using Distributed Confinement
|
||||
# such that the third-party code never sees the bits of the SturdyRefs and cannot directly
|
||||
# exercise the owner's power to restore refs. See:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# http://www.erights.org/elib/capability/dist-confine.html
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Resist the urge to represent an Owner as a simple public key. The whole point of sealing is to
|
||||
# defend against leaked-storage attacks. Such attacks can easily result in the owner's private
|
||||
# key being stolen as well. A better solution is for `Owner` to contain a simple globally unique
|
||||
# identifier for the owner, and for everyone to separately maintain a mapping of owner IDs to
|
||||
# public keys. If an owner's private key is compromised, then humans will need to communicate
|
||||
# and agree on a replacement public key, then update the mapping.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# As a concrete example, an `Owner` could simply contain a domain name, and restoring a SturdyRef
|
||||
# would require signing a request using the domain's private key. Authenticating this key could
|
||||
# be accomplished through certificate authorities or web-of-trust techniques.
|
||||
|
||||
save @0 SaveParams -> SaveResults;
|
||||
# Save a capability persistently so that it can be restored by a future connection. Not all
|
||||
# capabilities can be saved -- application interfaces should define which capabilities support
|
||||
# this and which do not.
|
||||
|
||||
struct SaveParams {
|
||||
sealFor @0 :Owner;
|
||||
# Seal the SturdyRef so that it can only be restored by the specified Owner. This is meant
|
||||
# to mitigate damage when a SturdyRef is leaked. See comments above.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Leaving this value null may or may not be allowed; it is up to the realm to decide. If a
|
||||
# realm does allow a null owner, this should indicate that anyone is allowed to restore the
|
||||
# ref.
|
||||
}
|
||||
struct SaveResults {
|
||||
sturdyRef @0 :SturdyRef;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
annotation persistent(interface, field) :Void;
|
||||
# Apply this annotation to interfaces for objects that will always be persistent, instead of
|
||||
# extending the Persistent capability, since the correct type parameters to Persistent depend on
|
||||
# the realm, which is orthogonal to the interface type and therefore should not be defined
|
||||
# along-side it.
|
||||
# TODO: removed SturdyRef to build API in C#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# You may also apply this annotation to a capability-typed field which will always contain a
|
||||
# persistent capability, but where the capability's interface itself is not already marked
|
||||
# persistent.
|
||||
#$import "/capnp/c++.capnp".namespace("capnp");
|
||||
#
|
||||
#interface Persistent@0xc8cb212fcd9f5691(SturdyRef, Owner) {
|
||||
# # Interface implemented by capabilities that outlive a single connection. A client may save()
|
||||
# # the capability, producing a SturdyRef. The SturdyRef can be stored to disk, then later used to
|
||||
# # obtain a new reference to the capability on a future connection.
|
||||
# #
|
||||
# # The exact format of SturdyRef depends on the "realm" in which the SturdyRef appears. A "realm"
|
||||
# # is an abstract space in which all SturdyRefs have the same format and refer to the same set of
|
||||
# # resources. Every vat is in exactly one realm. All capability clients within that vat must
|
||||
# # produce SturdyRefs of the format appropriate for the realm.
|
||||
# #
|
||||
# # Similarly, every VatNetwork also resides in a particular realm. Usually, a vat's "realm"
|
||||
# # corresponds to the realm of its main VatNetwork. However, a Vat can in fact communicate over
|
||||
# # a VatNetwork in a different realm -- in this case, all SturdyRefs need to be transformed when
|
||||
# # coming or going through said VatNetwork. The RPC system has hooks for registering
|
||||
# # transformation callbacks for this purpose.
|
||||
# #
|
||||
# # Since the format of SturdyRef is realm-dependent, it is not defined here. An application should
|
||||
# # choose an appropriate realm for itself as part of its design. Note that under Sandstorm, every
|
||||
# # application exists in its own realm and is therefore free to define its own SturdyRef format;
|
||||
# # the Sandstorm platform handles translating between realms.
|
||||
# #
|
||||
# # Note that whether a capability is persistent is often orthogonal to its type. In these cases,
|
||||
# # the capability's interface should NOT inherit `Persistent`; instead, just perform a cast at
|
||||
# # runtime. It's not type-safe, but trying to be type-safe in these cases will likely lead to
|
||||
# # tears. In cases where a particular interface only makes sense on persistent capabilities, it
|
||||
# # still should not explicitly inherit Persistent because the `SturdyRef` and `Owner` types will
|
||||
# # vary between realms (they may even be different at the call site than they are on the
|
||||
# # implementation). Instead, mark persistent interfaces with the $persistent annotation (defined
|
||||
# # below).
|
||||
# #
|
||||
# # Sealing
|
||||
# # -------
|
||||
# #
|
||||
# # As an added security measure, SturdyRefs may be "sealed" to a particular owner, such that
|
||||
# # if the SturdyRef itself leaks to a third party, that party cannot actually restore it because
|
||||
# # they are not the owner. To restore a sealed capability, you must first prove to its host that
|
||||
# # you are the rightful owner. The precise mechanism for this authentication is defined by the
|
||||
# # realm.
|
||||
# #
|
||||
# # Sealing is a defense-in-depth mechanism meant to mitigate damage in the case of catastrophic
|
||||
# # attacks. For example, say an attacker temporarily gains read access to a database full of
|
||||
# # SturdyRefs: it would be unfortunate if it were then necessary to revoke every single reference
|
||||
# # in the database to prevent the attacker from using them.
|
||||
# #
|
||||
# # In general, an "owner" is a course-grained identity. Because capability-based security is still
|
||||
# # the primary mechanism of security, it is not necessary nor desirable to have a separate "owner"
|
||||
# # identity for every single process or object; that is exactly what capabilities are supposed to
|
||||
# # avoid! Instead, it makes sense for an "owner" to literally identify the owner of the machines
|
||||
# # where the capability is stored. If untrusted third parties are able to run arbitrary code on
|
||||
# # said machines, then the sandbox for that code should be designed using Distributed Confinement
|
||||
# # such that the third-party code never sees the bits of the SturdyRefs and cannot directly
|
||||
# # exercise the owner's power to restore refs. See:
|
||||
# #
|
||||
# # http://www.erights.org/elib/capability/dist-confine.html
|
||||
# #
|
||||
# # Resist the urge to represent an Owner as a simple public key. The whole point of sealing is to
|
||||
# # defend against leaked-storage attacks. Such attacks can easily result in the owner's private
|
||||
# # key being stolen as well. A better solution is for `Owner` to contain a simple globally unique
|
||||
# # identifier for the owner, and for everyone to separately maintain a mapping of owner IDs to
|
||||
# # public keys. If an owner's private key is compromised, then humans will need to communicate
|
||||
# # and agree on a replacement public key, then update the mapping.
|
||||
# #
|
||||
# # As a concrete example, an `Owner` could simply contain a domain name, and restoring a SturdyRef
|
||||
# # would require signing a request using the domain's private key. Authenticating this key could
|
||||
# # be accomplished through certificate authorities or web-of-trust techniques.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# save @0 SaveParams -> SaveResults;
|
||||
# # Save a capability persistently so that it can be restored by a future connection. Not all
|
||||
# # capabilities can be saved -- application interfaces should define which capabilities support
|
||||
# # this and which do not.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# struct SaveParams {
|
||||
# sealFor @0 :Owner;
|
||||
# # Seal the SturdyRef so that it can only be restored by the specified Owner. This is meant
|
||||
# # to mitigate damage when a SturdyRef is leaked. See comments above.
|
||||
# #
|
||||
# # Leaving this value null may or may not be allowed; it is up to the realm to decide. If a
|
||||
# # realm does allow a null owner, this should indicate that anyone is allowed to restore the
|
||||
# # ref.
|
||||
# }
|
||||
# struct SaveResults {
|
||||
# sturdyRef @0 :SturdyRef;
|
||||
# }
|
||||
#}
|
||||
#
|
||||
#annotation persistent(interface, field) :Void;
|
||||
## Apply this annotation to interfaces for objects that will always be persistent, instead of
|
||||
## extending the Persistent capability, since the correct type parameters to Persistent depend on
|
||||
## the realm, which is orthogonal to the interface type and therefore should not be defined
|
||||
## along-side it.
|
||||
##
|
||||
## You may also apply this annotation to a capability-typed field which will always contain a
|
||||
## persistent capability, but where the capability's interface itself is not already marked
|
||||
## persistent.
|
||||
##
|
||||
## Note that absence of the $persistent annotation doesn't mean a capability of that type isn't
|
||||
## persistent; it just means not *all* such capabilities are persistent.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Note that absence of the $persistent annotation doesn't mean a capability of that type isn't
|
||||
# persistent; it just means not *all* such capabilities are persistent.
|
||||
|
@ -3,7 +3,9 @@
|
||||
using CSharp = import "programming_language/csharp.capnp";
|
||||
$CSharp.namespace("FabAccessAPI.Schema");
|
||||
|
||||
using import "persistent.capnp".Persistent;
|
||||
# TODO: removed SturdyRef to build API in C#
|
||||
# using import "persistent.capnp".Persistent;
|
||||
|
||||
using import "notify.capnp".Notifiable;
|
||||
using import "interest.capnp".Interestable;
|
||||
using import "claim.capnp".Claimable;
|
||||
|
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ interface Resources {
|
||||
|
||||
list @1 () -> ( resources :List(Resource) );
|
||||
|
||||
getByUrn @2 ( urn :Text ) -> ( resource :Resource );
|
||||
getByUrn @2 ( urn :Text ) -> ( resource :Resource, dummy :UInt8 = 0 );
|
||||
# Returns a NULL capability if the resource doesn't exist or an user doesn't have disclose
|
||||
# permission for that resource.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
|
||||
@0xed0c02f41fea6b5a;
|
||||
|
||||
using CSharp = import "programming_language/csharp.capnp";
|
||||
$CSharp.namespace("FabAccessAPI.Schema");
|
||||
|
||||
interface L10NString {
|
||||
# Any string type that is intended to be displayed to an user that is more than an identifier to
|
||||
# be used as-is must be able to be localized into the users preferred language. This includes
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user