improved authentication process

FabAccessAPI/Auth.cs

@@ -1,18 +1,14 @@
-using System;
+using Capnp;
-using System.Collections.Generic;
-using System.Linq;
-using System.Reflection;
-using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
-using System.Text;
-using System.Threading;
-using System.Threading.Tasks;
-using Capnp;
-using Capnp.Rpc;
 using FabAccessAPI.Schema;
 using S22.Sasl;
+using System;
+using System.Collections.Generic;
+using System.IO;
+using System.Linq;
+using System.Threading.Tasks;
+using Exception = System.Exception;
 
-namespace FabAccessAPI
+namespace FabAccessAPI {
-{
     /// Authentication Identity
     ///
     /// Under the hood a string because the form depends heavily on the method
@@ -49,7 +45,7 @@ namespace FabAccessAPI
     /// This struct contains the user as is passed to the actual authentication/authorization
     /// subsystems
     ///
-    public struct User {
+    public struct AuthUser {
         /// Contains the Authentication ID used
         ///
         /// The authentication ID is an identifier for the authentication exchange. This is different
@@ -101,6 +97,11 @@ namespace FabAccessAPI
 
     }
 
+    class UnauthorizedException : Exception{}
+
+    /// <summary>
+    /// THIS IS VERY INCOMPLETE!
+    /// </summary>
     class Auth {
         private IAuthentication _authCap;
         public Auth(IAuthentication authCap) {
@@ -111,7 +112,7 @@ namespace FabAccessAPI
             return _authCap.Mechanisms();
         }
 
-        public async Task<bool> Handshake() {
+        public bool Handshake(Stream stream) {
             var host = "localhost";
             var asm = typeof(Api).Assembly;
             var program = $"{asm.FullName}-{asm.GetName().Version}";
@@ -141,9 +142,14 @@ namespace FabAccessAPI
             Console.WriteLine($"Server: {serverInfo.Host}");
             Console.WriteLine($"Version: {serverInfo.Program}");
             Console.WriteLine($"API-Version: {serverInfo.Major}.{serverInfo.Minor}");
+
+            //TODO: Check if we are actually compatible. This will probably need some internal lookup or well defined versioning semantics
+            return true;
         }
 
-        public async Task<object> Authenticate(string mech, Dictionary<string, object> properties) {
+        public async Task<bool> Authenticate(string mech, Dictionary<string, object> properties) {
+            //TODO: Perform Handshake to verify that we are compatible with server
+
             var m = SaslFactory.Create(mech);
             foreach (KeyValuePair<string, object> entry in properties) {
                 m.Properties.Add(entry.Key, entry.Value);
@@ -170,8 +176,17 @@ namespace FabAccessAPI
                 }
             }
 
+            if (resp.which == Response.WHICH.Outcome) {
+                if (resp.Outcome.Result == Response.Result.successful) {
+                    return true;
+                }
+                else {
+                    //TODO: Provide meaningful info about auth failure
+                    return false;
+                }
+            }
 
-            return null;
+            return false;
         }
 
         

FabAccessAPI/Connection.cs

@@ -1,19 +1,16 @@
-using System;
+using Capnp.Rpc;
-using System.Collections.Generic;
-using System.IO;
-using System.Text;
-using System.Threading.Tasks;
-using Capnp;
-using Capnp.Rpc;
 using FabAccessAPI.Schema;
+using System;
+using System.Collections.Generic;
+using System.Threading.Tasks;
 
-namespace FabAccessAPI
+namespace FabAccessAPI {
-{
     class Connection {
-        private TcpRpcClient _rpcClient;
+        private TcpRpcClient? _rpcClient = null;
-        private IBootstrap _bootstrapCap;
+        private IBootstrap? _bootstrapCap = null;
-        private User _user;
+        private AuthUser? _authUser = null;
-        private Auth _auth;
+        private Auth? _auth = null;
+        private Machines? _machines = null;
 
         /// <summary>
         /// 
@@ -24,9 +21,31 @@ namespace FabAccessAPI
             _bootstrapCap = _rpcClient.GetMain<IBootstrap>();
         }
 
-        async Task Auth(string mech, Dictionary<string, string> kvs) {
+        /// <summary>
+        /// Authenticate this connection.
+        /// Calling this more then once is UB
+        /// </summary>
+        /// <param name="mech">The desired authentication mechanism</param>
+        /// <param name="kvs">Key-Value data specific to the mechanism</param>
+        /// <returns></returns>
+        async Task Auth(string mech, Dictionary<string, object> kvs) {
             _auth = new Auth(await _bootstrapCap.Auth());
             var mechs = await _auth.GetMechanisms().ConfigureAwait(false);
+            Console.WriteLine("The Server supports the following auth mechs:");
+            Console.Write(mechs);
+
+            // TODO: Check that the requested auth mech is actually available.
+
+            await _auth.Authenticate(mech, kvs).ConfigureAwait(false);
+        }
+
+        /// <summary>
+        /// Get a wrapped capability to interact with machines
+        /// </summary>
+        /// <returns>A wrapped capability to interact with machines</returns>
+        async Task<Machines> AccessMachines() {
+            _machines ??= new Machines((await _bootstrapCap.Machines().ConfigureAwait(false)));
+            return _machines;
         }
     }
 }