wisemapping-frontend/packages/mindplot/test/unit/import/expected/enc.wxml

<map name="enc" version="tango">
    <topic central="true" text="Artigos GF comentários interessantes" id="1">
        <topic position="-200,-50" order="1" shape="rectangle" id="5" bgColor="#cccccc">
            <text><![CDATA[Baraloto et al. 2010. Functional trait variation and sampling strategies in species-rich plant
communities]]></text>
            <topic position="-200,-350" order="1" shape="line" id="6"/>
            <topic position="290,-150" order="0" shape="line" id="7">
                <text><![CDATA[However, the fast pace of
                            development of plant trait meta-analyses also suggests that
                            trait acquisition in the field is a factor limiting the growth of
                            plant trait data bases.]]></text>
            </topic>
            <topic position="380,-125" order="1" shape="line" id="8">
                <text><![CDATA[We measured
                            traits for every individual tree in nine 1-ha plots in tropical
                            lowland rainforest (N = 4709). Each plant was sampled for
                            10 functional traits related to wood and leaf morphology and
                            ecophysiology. Here, we contrast the trait means and variances
                            obtained with a full sampling strategy with those of
                            other sampling designs used in the recent literature, which we
                            obtain by simulation. We assess the differences in community-
                            level estimates of functional trait means and variances
                            among design types and sampling intensities. We then contrast
                            the relative costs of these designs and discuss the appropriateness
                            of different sampling designs and intensities for
                            different questions and systems.]]></text>
            </topic>
            <topic position="470,-100" order="2" shape="line" id="9">
                <text><![CDATA[Falar que a escolha das categorias de sucessão e dos parâmetros ou característica dos indivíduos que
serão utilizadas dependera da facilidade de coleta dos dados e do custo monetário e
temporal.]]></text>
            </topic>
            <topic position="560,-75" order="3" shape="line" id="12">
                <text><![CDATA[Ver se classifica sucessão por densidade de tronco para citar no artigo como exemplo de outros
atributos além de germinação e ver se e custoso no tempo e em
dinheiro]]></text>
            </topic>
            <topic position="650,-50" order="4" shape="line" id="13">
                <text><![CDATA[Intensas amostragens de experimentos simples  tem maior retorno em acurácia de estimativa e de custo
tb.]]></text>
            </topic>
            <topic position="740,-25" order="5" shape="line" id="14">
                <text><![CDATA[With regard to estimating mean trait values, strategies
                            alternative to BRIDGE were consistently cost-effective. On
                            the other hand, strategies alternative to BRIDGE clearly
                            failed to accurately estimate the variance of trait values. This
                            indicates that in situations where accurate estimation of plotlevel
                            variance is desired, complete censuses are essential.]]></text>
            </topic>
            <topic position="830,0" order="6" shape="line" id="15">
                <text><![CDATA[We suggest that, in these studies,
                            the investment in complete sampling may be worthwhile
                            for at least some traits.]]></text>
                <note><![CDATA[Falar que isso corrobora nossa sugestão de utilizar poucas medidas, mas que elas sejam confiáveis.]]></note>
            </topic>
        </topic>
        <topic position="-290,-12" order="0" text="Chazdon 2010. Biotropica. 42(1): 31–40" shape="rectangle" id="17" bgColor="#cccccc">
            <topic position="290,-137" order="0" shape="line" id="22">
                <text><![CDATA[Here, we develop a new approach that links functional attributes
                            of tree species with studies of forest recovery and regional
                            land-use transitions (Chazdon et al. 2007). Grouping species according
                            to their functional attributes or demographic rates provides
                            insight into both applied and theoretical questions, such as selecting
                            species for reforestation programs, assessing ecosystem services, and
                            understanding community assembly processes in tropical forests
                            (Diaz et al. 2007, Kraft et al. 2008).]]></text>
            </topic>
            <topic position="380,-112" order="1" shape="line" id="23">
                <text><![CDATA[Since we have data on leaf
                            and wood functional traits for only a subset of the species in our
                            study sites, we based our functional type classification on information
                            for a large number of tree species obtained through vegetation
                            monitoring studies.]]></text>
            </topic>
            <topic position="470,-87" order="2" shape="line" id="24">
                <text><![CDATA[Falar no artigo que esse trabalho fala que é inadequada a divisão entre pioneira e não pioneira
devido a grande variação que há entre elas. Além de terem descoberto que durante a ontogenia a
resposta a luminosidade muda dentro de uma mesma espécie. Porém recomendar que essa classificação
continue sendo usada em curto prazo enquanto não há informações confiáveis suficiente para esta
simples classificação. Outras classificações como esta do artigo são bem vinda, contanto que tenham
dados confiáveis. Porém dados estáticos já são difíceis de se obter, dados temporais, como taxa de
crescimento em diâmetro ou altura, são mais difíceis ainda. Falar que vários tipos de classificações
podem ser utilizadas e quanto mais detalhe melhor, porém os dados é que são mais limitantes. Se
focarmos em dados de germinação e crescimento limitantes, como sugerem sainete e whitmore, da uma
idéia maismrápida e a curto prazo da classificação destas espécies. Depois com o tempo conseguiremos
construir classificações mais detalhadas e com mais dados confiáveis.
]]></text>
            </topic>
            <topic position="560,-62" order="3" shape="line" id="25">
                <text><![CDATA[Our approach avoided preconceived notions of successional
                            behavior or shade tolerance of tree species by developing an objective
                            and independent classification of functional types based on vegetation
                            monitoring data from permanent sample plots in mature and
                            secondary forests of northeastern Costa Rica (Finegan et al. 1999,
                            Chazdon et al. 2007).We apply an independent, prior classification
                            of 293 tree species from our study region into five functional types, based on two species attributes: canopy strata and diameter growth
                            rates for individuals Z10 cm dbh (Finegan et al. 1999, Salgado-
                            Negret 2007).]]></text>
            </topic>
            <topic position="650,-37" order="4" shape="line" id="26">
                <text><![CDATA[Our results demonstrate strong linkages between functional
                            types defined by adult height and growth rates of large trees and
                            colonization groups based on the timing of seedling, sapling, and
                            tree recruitment in secondary forests.]]></text>
            </topic>
            <topic position="740,-12" order="5" shape="line" id="27"/>
            <topic position="830,13" order="6" shape="line" id="28"/>
            <topic position="920,38" order="7" shape="line" id="29"/>
            <topic position="1010,63" order="8" shape="line" id="30">
                <text><![CDATA[Classifying functional types
                            based on functional traits with low plasticity, such as wood density
                            and seed size, could potentially serve as robust proxies for demographic
                            variables (Poorter et al. 2008, Zhang et al. 2008).]]></text>
            </topic>
            <topic position="1100,88" order="9" shape="line" id="31">
                <text><![CDATA[CONDIT, R., S. P. HUBBELL, AND R. B. FOSTER. 1996. Assessing the response of
                            plant functional types in tropical forests to climatic change. J. Veg. Sci.
                            7: 405–416.
                            DALLING, J. S., AND S. P. HUBBELL. 2002. Seed size, growth rate and gap microsite
                            conditions as determinants of recruitment success for pioneer species.
                            J. Ecol. 90: 557–568.
                            FINEGAN, B. 1996. Pattern and process in neotropical secondary forests: The first
                            100 years of succession. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 119–124.
                            POORTER, L., S. J. WRIGHT, H. PAZ, D. D. ACKERLY, R. CONDIT, G.
                            IBARRA-MANRI´QUEZ, K. E. HARMS, J. C. LICONA, M.MARTI´NEZ-RAMOS,
                            S. J. MAZER, H. C. MULLER-LANDAU, M. PEN˜ A-CLAROS, C. O. WEBB,
                            AND I. J. WRIGHT. 2008. Are functional traits good predictors of demographic
                            rates? Evidence from five Neotropical forests. Ecology 89:
                            1908–1920.
                            ZHANG, Z. D., R. G. ZANG, AND Y. D. QI. 2008. Spatiotemporal patterns and
                            dynamics of species richness and abundance of woody plant functional
                            groups in a tropical forest landscape of Hainan Island, South China.
                            J. Integr. Plant Biol. 50: 547–558.]]></text>
            </topic>
        </topic>
        <topic position="-380,0" order="1" text="Poorter 1999. Functional Ecology. 13:396-410" shape="rectangle" id="2" bgColor="#cccccc">
            <topic position="380,-12" order="0" text="Espécies pioneiras crescem mais rápido do que as não pioneiras" shape="line" id="3">
                <topic position="-380,-24" order="0" text="Tolerância a sombra está relacionada com persistência e não com crescimento" shape="line" id="4"/>
            </topic>
        </topic>
    </topic>
</map>